Bottom Line

Publisher’s Commentary by Wallace J. Allen

 Is Trump manipulating his way to declaring Martial Law? He has placed troops on the Southern Border in the name of a fictional invasion. He is  using the Alien Enemies Act to make his point by deporting  immigrants, documented or not. He is securing subtle support from closet racist by focusing his immigrant hate on people of color! If someone is not an anti-racist, one might fall into the category of racist.

He is deporting non-white people that he simply declares to be here illegally, while expressing the idea that there should be more people from places like Sweden and Denmark coming to America! See it live daily! He calls Immigrants  invaders in America, the country created by immigrants! He cites immigrants as invaders in order to say that America is in fact at war! If he can convinces us that he believes that America is at war, he can declare a State Of Emergency, which is what he did to place our military troops along the Southern Boarder. The resistance to that unconstitutional move was very slight, and thus a green light for his next assault on the Constitution!

The door has been opened to Martial Law and his apparent ultimate dream status of President for life. He has started so many fires of distraction that I fear we are ignoring his most dangerous plot.

The increasing chaos and confusion caused by his assault on the Economy, Social Security, Healthcare, Education and Foreign Relations is engineered chaos! This chaos will fan the flames of resistance. Protests will increase! Adding to the probability of a protest being used as the final excuse for him to declare Martial Law! No law prevents him from doing it and he certainly has the audacity and cult following to force the question!

Publisher’s Commentary by Wallace Allen IV

A fight between two students at Jehue Middle School, located in the Rialto Unified School District, has resulted in a recommendation for felony charges against one student and misdemeanor charges against the other.

The fight evolved in a classroom with other students and a substitute teacher present. Witnesses of the event agree that one of the participants began the show by using a water gun to shoot water on several students, and that one of the people hit by the water had an issue with not only the water splashing, but also something about a pencil.

A real physical fight quickly developed from the loud arguing between the two students, one, a small-in-stature female and the other, a much bigger in height and weight male. The fight lasted long enough for anyone who saw the viral video to wonder, “Where is the teacher?” After about 15 seconds of video, the female student was slammed onto a desk and apparently rendered unconscious. As several students went to the aid of the fallen warrior, the question about the teacher’s presence was answered in that you could hear her voice, not addressing the incident or checking the status of the fallen, apparently unconscious student.

The fight provides another level of concern when it is revealed that the female combatant is Black and the male is Brown. The N-word was used by the male fighter, as well as by some other students! As these children wallow in the racist terminology, they have no knowledge of the fact that most of them in the room would have been forced to use the back doors and drink from separate water fountains in Mississippi during the 1950s Jim Crow Era! Furthermore, they, Black and Brown, are equally subject to being picked up and deported by ICE during the present-day Trump era!

Yet some Black and Brown spoke-stars are able to discern the differences between Black and Brown folks enough to promote the ‘they are not like us’ aspect of the relationship. Who does that line of thinking really help? Justifying the divide between Black and Brown people is a tool that benefits fascism and white superiority!

Felonies and misdemeanors are not solutions for the children who drink the poison Kool-aid that encourages violence as a solution to chaos and confusion. Our children need to be protected and nourished!

The students who fought and who witnessed the fight, plus the teacher who was in the room before and during, should all be required to participate in counseling designed to manage and deescalate anger.

Publisher’s Commentary by Wallace J. Allen, Iv.

The proposed February 28^th boycott against spending is an attempt to impress corporate America with the power of the Black Dollar; to show corporate America our displeasure with their retreat from Diversity, Equity, Inclusion (DEI)! We, Black people are requested by civil rights activist and organizations to ‘spend no money’ at all on this Friday, February 28, 2025! However, understanding the difficulty of getting everyone to be able to, or truthfully, want to, participate in the boycott, the follow-up statement is a request to spend as little as necessary.  There is much to be desired relative to our (Black Folks) ability to successfully manipulate our Trillion-Dollar-Plus annual spending power!

In the past, we have successfully refused to spend with businesses where we were not allowed to work… We have been able to successfully impress corporate America with our spending power. However, somehow, we have not perfected our ability to successfully promote and market the obvious benefit of directing our spending power towards developing Black Owned Businesses (BOB)!

I agree that using our spending power to respond to disrespect and mistreatment is something we should do. I think that using our money to develop our self-respect and to assure proper treatment is also something we should do! Just as we can target who not to support financially, we have the ability, some would say responsibility, to target Black Owned Businesses (BOB) with our support!   Many of us are supporting BOB on a regular basis. However, I think you will agree that if we come together to recycle 10% of our Trillion-Dollar-Plus spending, which would amount to about 150 billion Dollars Annually, we would not only impress corporate America, but we would also impress the world, and more importantly, we would impress ourselves!

This resource was supported in whole or in part by funding provided by the State of California, administered by the California State Library via California Black Media as part of the Stop the Hate program. The program is supported by partnership with the California Department of Social Services and the California Commission on Asian and Pacific Islander American Affairs. To report a hate incident or hate crime and get support, go to https://www.cavshate.org/

The California Attorney General’s Office, in 1968, issued a report titled; Palm Springs Section 14 Demolition. The final paragraph of that document is reprinted here…

“The City of Palm Springs not only disregarded the residents of Section 14 as property-owners, taxpayers, and voters. Palm Springs ignored that the residents of Section 14 were human beings.”

The Civil Rights Act was in effect… And yet, the ‘City engineered holocaust’, as described by the AG’s Report, was classified as not illegal, and allowed to continue terrorizing the surviving Section 14 victims and descendants… Section 14’s homes and personal belongings, were not the only things devastated by the fire! People were devastated… But people were not only devastated by the fire, they were, in many cases, most devastated by the blatant hateful racism that it takes to treat people as non-human!
The painful effects of institutional racism go deeper and last longer than that human to human kind of misunderstanding… Institutional racism is terrorizing because it is considered legal! However, sometimes mistakes are made and a crack is created in the institutional racism shield…
The City of Palm Springs recently offered 4 plus million dollars to the ‘Survivors of Section 14’, an organization representing the 300 plus families and their 1200 plus members, an offer which was refused! I think that the offer was/is an insult, and that the city having enough distain for the survivors to make such a stand is another example of the ongoing hate crime being perpetrated on the surviving victims of the “City engineered holocaust”, the demolition of Palm Springs Section 14!
The coordinated actions designed to take property legally through eminent domain is painful enough. But even worse was the City choosing to hatefully, just snatch the land from underneath its owners ignoring their humanity!
I will be reporting this hate crime via the Stop The Hate recommended method and I will report more regarding the victims as I get back to you next week!
This resource was supported in whole or in part by funding provided by the State of California, administered by the California State Library via California Black Media as part of the Stop the Hate Program. The program is supported by partnership with California Department of Social Services and the California Commission on Asian and Pacific Islander American Affairs as part of the Stop the Hate program. To report a hate incident or hate crime and get support, 833-8-NO-HATE 833-866-4283
Listen to Empire Talks Back radio Host, Wallace Allen interview Attorney Areva Martin and Pearl Devers, founder of the ‘Palm Springs Survivors of Section 14’,
The Palm Springs Section 14 Survivors are victims of what the 1968 report from the California Attorney General’s Office describes as “A city engineered holocaust”, as an estimated 200 African American homes were burned, bulldozed… Demolished in the city of Palm Springs by the Palm Springs Fire Department. As community organizations and government entities across the state participate in “Unite Against The Hate” activities, beginning September 21st, we think that it is important to point out that as we voice our distain for hate, our government institutions are in some places still defending it!
As partners in the CA vs Hate Program, what are the Attorney General, the Civil Rights Division, and the Department of Social Services doing about the plight of the Palm Springs Section 14 Survivors of the “City engineered Holocaust”?

Publisher’s Commentary by Wallace J. Allen IV

2: $10 billion bonds to build educational facilities Schools, Yes

3: Right to Marry, Yes

4: $10 Billion Bonds funding environmental projects, Yes

5: Easier 55% vote to pass; Housing Bonds, Yes

6: End involuntary servitude, Yes

32: Increase minimum wage to $18, Yes

33: Too Much Rent Control, No

34: Requires Health Care Providers to use 98% of pharmaceutical revenue for services, Yes

35: Tax on MCO’s to fund Medi-Cal, Yes

36: More Arrests, No

Publisher’s Commentary by Wallace J. Allen, IV

Racial equity was the cornerstone of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s mission and messaging. A mission and messaging that is being as blatantly challenged today by bigots as it was during the height of the Civil Rights Movement!

This resurgence of hate and bigotry must be met by a renewed commitment to not only refuse to be bigots, but also become anti-bigots as individuals, and as institutions! To exemplify the local urgency, please note the recent settlement by the Department of Justice (DOJ), City of Hesperia and the San Bernardino County Sheriff for enforcing rental policies that discriminate against Black folks.

The Westside Story Newspaper, founded in 1987, has earned the reputation as a trusted advocate for and is a messenger to the Black and Brown Communities of the Inland Empire, particularly in the cities of Rialto, San Bernardino, and Fontana, where the concentration of Black people is the greatest. Colton and Highland are also experiencing growth in the population of Blacks.

I am asking that you place your message in one of, or both of the special January issues of WssNews that acknowledge the celebration of Dr. King’s life and mission. Your advertising participation will help to clarify and reinforce the perception that you and your institution support the concepts of racial and social equity as represented by Dr. King. It will also indicate that you not only reject bigotry but are fighting it as well!

WssNews will publish two “Salute to Martin” editions. January12 will focus on planned events and January 19 will cover results of some of those events.

Call WssNews at (909) 384-8131 and leave your contact information or email walleniv@yahoo.com. Use ‘Anti-Bigot’ as the Subject.

Publisher’s Commentary by Wallace J. Allen, IV

A surveillance video depicting the July 16th shooting of 23-year-old Robert Adams, shows a plain looking dark colored auto driving onto a parking lot… Simultaneously a man with something in his hand begins walking towards the car but suddenly turns and quickly takes off running away towards some cars parked near a wall… As he is running away, two men exit the car, one starts shooting… The man running falls to the ground.

I am told by authorities that the men in the dark colored auto were police investigating an illegal gambling site and that the man shot was working as illegal security for the illicit operation… And that he was running to a place of shelter from where he could shoot at the police… So the officer felt threatened and began firing… Robert Adams died with multiple bullet wounds in the back.

Police say the object in Robert’s hand was a gun… Robert’s mother says that she was on the phone with Robert when he was shot… She says that she heard the gunshots that took her son’s life! Was the object in his hand a gun or a phone?

The video, as I see it, does not look like a police operation… The car the police are in does not appear to be a police car nor do the men in the car look like police! The only thing that identifies this as a police operation is the police explanation of what my eyes see! My eyes, without the police voice-over description, see two men jumping from an auto and after two or three steps, one immediately starts shooting at a fleeing man!

I was enticed to be influenced by negative statements about Robert’s past. Enticed to believe that he was a ‘bad dude’ that deserved to be shot. My logic injects, if Robert was all that they say he was, why did they not arrest him sooner… Why wait for fate to put Robert on the table… Wait for fate to bring this ‘bad dude’ to them during a police operation that the police say was based on investigating illegal gambling? That means that the police did not go to that site with Robert Adams as their subject of attention! If Robert was not their reason for being there, it appears that the description of Robert as a ‘bad dude’ is a convenient after-thought to justify the killing!

The video content does not look like a police operation… It looks more like a low budget film depicting a gangland hit job!

Does police policy identify everyone that has a gun in their possession as someone police officers can shoot with indemnity? There are many people who have the right to carry a gun! How does the police policy deal with that? If officers have clearance to shoot because they feel threatened by someone that appears to have a gun, how does the public deal with that? Is it policy to shoot people because they run from people with guns who don’t look like police? If police are threatened enough by people with guns to shoot them, surely, we can understand why people are threatened enough by people with guns to run from them!

If the San Bernardino Police Department policy allows for officers to wear unofficial looking uniforms and drive plain looking autos to go out to investigate, but, end up shooting first and figuring out why later, the City is going to both, go broke from being sued and go to hell for being the devil!

Robert Adams was a Black Man, loved by his family and respected by his friends… And, even the police who ended his life, point out that he had a job!

Publisher’s Commentary by Wallace Allen IV

I think that the ‘slap heard round the world’ was a skit. The sports’ world use of instant replay has demonstrated the importance of the angle that you see from. We had a bad angle! Actors throw fake punches for a living! It looked real, except for Chris’ reaction. He said, “Wow, Will Smith just smacked the s#@% out of me!”, and was moving on until Will yelled out from his seat that he had quickly returned to. Chris gave him a few more seconds to get his clown on, as Will screamed out several times about ‘My wife’!  Then, on with the show!

Will had delivered what appeared to be a wind-up slap that should have at least knocked Chris down! Chris didn’t fall, though he did stumble backward, as his script would call for to make the slap look real. I think that Will did not slap the s— out of Chris! I think the joke was missed by an audience that was ready to accept some Negro shenanigans as part of the ‘coloring of the Oscars’…causing the joke to be taken seriously, giving the Smiths’ a ton of chaos-based publicity that they feed on, so well!

The above opinions are not fact based and neither are any of my interesting observations below.

• Will Smith would not have slapped Wesley Snipes! (Or anybody else that wasn’t in on the joke!)
• Which is true?  Will’s slap is weak, or Chris’ jaw is a rock, or the slap wasn’t real!
• No joke steals Jada’s Beauty!
• Shaved headed men are constant joke butts
• Chris did not make fun of alopecia, he made fun of a beautiful woman who has a shaved head.
• Will knows how to throw a straight powerful punch, he learned that in preparing for the Muhammed Ali role. Will did not throw a true angry punch! Therefore, I think his defending-my-family speech is whack!
• Chris Rock could be considered the good guy because he did not press charges… or he may simply remember what happened to the guy who made a false police report in Chicago.
• The real untold Oscars story is about the Regina Hall skit… she spoke of swabbing the back of a group of men’s throats with her tongue as her method of COVID’19 testing… and then she groped two men on her way off the stage. Rampant sexism ignored!

Publishers Commentary by Wallace J. Allen IV

There would be no reason to teach Black History if the history taught in America was truly America’s history; however, American history, as it is taught, is America’s glorification of White people. Black History is acknowledged as information not only untold, but often denied and purposefully hidden by White society in general and European based political entities in specific. From the false religious interpretations justifying the enslavement of Africans to the present-day denial of institutional based systematic racism; we can conclude that if truth is important, teaching Black History is necessary!  We are confronted today with the governor of Florida perpetuating a racist theory by wallowing in the sloppy racist concept that teaching the truth about the history of Black People will make white children feel guilty, and thus should not be taught! I say that denying truth should not be considered as comforting!

The fact that American history as taught does not accurately depict the pain and anguish of enslavement and its denial of basic human needs and human rights, to the enslaved, is undeniable… That fact is the justification of why Black History must be taught!  Why are there Black and white American Legions, Black and white medical associations, Black and white lawyer associations, Black and white fraternities and sororities? The short answer is that the white organizations denied entry to Blacks.

America is a living organ that has not only a potential for life but also like all living things, has a potential for death! Any entity that denies its past is existing as a lie! The past only becomes the past when it is acknowledged!  When the past is regarded and treated like a dirty secret, it requires all who keep it to become liars! Existing as a liar, running from the truth, is, in my opinion, not living! America needs to tell her truth if she is to live!

I do not regard uninformed or misinformed people as liars.  Those that know better are the only ones responsible for doing better! Those who know the truth are responsible for telling the truth!

Why is there a Black History Month?

Please study and explore the history of Black people in and beyond the American experience. Ask the questions! Seek the answers! Think critically! Tell and be the truth!

Publisher’s Commentary by Wallace Allen

Testing The Test!

The test for COVID-19 is being suggested by some and required by some others. Various activities and events may require evidence of a negative test in order to participate or attend. Having a negative test days before the planned activity or event is often the recommended policy that represents the safe way to gather with others.

Does a negative result from a COVID-19 test truly indicate the COVID-19 status of the person who took the test?

Should we consider the recent exposure that occurred too recently for the test to detect or exposure any time after the test?

Thinking it through seems to suggest that the only thing that the test can really determine is if someone were negative at the time of the test, which is not an indication of their immediate, and certainly not their long-term status, such as one day later.

Taking the vaccine has become a social argument that is now documenting strong results for the vaccinated; however, the unvaccinated have among them some that take the efficiency gaps in bureaucratic policy, logic and procedures as reason to fight the shot.

If we were all tested daily, we would find people that test positive today who tested negative yesterday.

Insisting that taking the test is a truly relevant procedure feeds that skepticism. The energy and resources used on testing are probably better used elsewhere.