By
Manny Otiko and Tanu Henry California Black Media
(EMPIRE NEWS NETWORK—ENN)— At least three local branches of the NAACP in southern California – Riverside County, San Bernardino County and San Diego County – have broken ranks with the state chapter and the national organization, distancing themselves from the organization’s support of a moratorium on charter schools in California and across the country.
The
three NAACP chapters are calling into question the official NAACP position on a
charter moratorium. The branches are located in counties that are home to some
of the largest populations of African Americans according to census data.
There
are over 30 NAACP branches in California according to the NAACP web site.
This
week, the San Bernardino chapter rushed to submit a pro-charter school
resolution to the Baltimore national office of the NAACP ahead of a May 1
deadline. Although organizational rules prevent a local branch from
building programs or campaigns around a resolution until it is approved by the
national office, John Futch, who was elected president of the San Bernardino
branch late last year, says he is ready to begin working on the issue.
“I support charter schools,” he said. “It is important for us to recognize the work they are doing to improve education for children in our communities. It is not looking good right now in terms of kids performing poorly and dropping out.”
In its
resolution, the San Bernardino branch of the NAACP did not directly state that
it had a difference of opinion with the California state chapter or national
body. Instead, the branch officers pointed out their own reasons for supporting
school choice in the state and pushing for “quality education for all
African-American children.”
“The academic performance of African-American students must be the sole determinant of school district decision making rather than the financial benefit that a school district derives from public school funding generated by African-American students,” the statement read.
The
resolution also pointed out that there is a “severe and persistent
African-American achievement gap throughout the state of California” in both
English language arts and Math. And that 8 out of 10 African-American students
in California attend district-run public schools that continue to underperform
on statewide tests.
In an
email obtained by CBM, Thursday evening, Alice Huffman, a member of the
national board and the President of NAACP California Hawaii Conference, sent an
email to the dissenting branch officers asking them to walk back their
statements.
“This is to advise you all regarding your charter school counter resolution,” her email read. “The state has already taken a position of opposition and would appreciate it if you all would rescind your positions.
The
difference of opinion on school choice within the ranks of the NAACP reflects a
growing divide among Californians on the issue as well.
Four charter
school bills – three in the Assembly and one in the Senate – are making their
way through the legislative process. The Senate Education Committee voted for
last week to pass the most recent charter school bill, SB 756, which calls for
a 5-year moratorium on certifying new charter schools in the state. Then, last
month, the Assembly education committee cleared three other charter school
bills – AB 1505, 1506 and 1507. Together, the package of bills would put a
cap on the growth of the independently-run public schools, take away their
appeal rights and empower local school boards, which are frequently
unsupportive of charter schools, to approve or deny their applications for
certification and renewal.
“The
local branches are out of step with the state and national organization,” a
spokesperson for the California Chapter of the NAACP told CBM.
The
California state chapter of the NAACP supported all four charter school bills,
arguing that charter schools promote segregation and undermine the historical
fight to desegregate public education in the United States.
“The California NAACP and other community-based activists
have called upon education reforms to refocus on inequities rather than
privatization and private control of education. They are seeking to move the
discourse concretely from choice to equity,” said Julian Vasquez-Heilig,
Education chair of the California NAACP.
Christina Laster is a charter school mom and grandma – and a
former district-run public school employee who now serves as Education Chair of
the South Riverside branch of the NAACP. She says she also opposes the NAACP
national organization’s decision to support a moratorium on charter schools.
“There is a lot of misinformation out there about charter
schools,” said Laster. It is important to look at how this issue is impacting
Black families based on the data. We need to move in a direction that supports
Black families and what is best for Black children.”
Laster says she is ready defend her oppositional stance to
the national body of her organization. She says many of the issues she
experienced with racism, feeling unsupported and unwelcome, still persist today
in public high schools in Riverside County, where her children go to school.
In
2016, the national board of the NAACP voted to ratify a national moratorium on
charter schools. All 12 members of California’s Black Legislative Caucus
(CLBC), at the time, wrote a letter to the NAACP asking them to reconsider that
decision.
“It
should be noted that California’s Charter Schools serve many African American,
Latino, Pacific Islanders and low income students,” the letter stated. The CLBC
letter also pointed out that African-American charter school students in
California have a higher rate of acceptance (19 percent) to the
University of California system than traditional public schools (11 percent).
In the
state legislature as well as in communities across the state, the school choice
debate seems to be shaping up as one of the biggest battles that will play out
in California over the next few months. On one side, there is the California
Teachers Association (CTA), one of the largest unions in the state and large
civil rights organizations like the NAACP officially supporting the proposed
restrictions of charter schools. On the other, there is a growing group of
charter school advocates, including parents, community groups, churches and
grassroots organizations like the National Action Network coming out in strong
and vocal support of California families’ option to choose where they want
their children to go to school.
Charter school operators and school choice advocates are
concerned the set of proposals in the legislature would, eventually, lead to
the complete elimination of charter schools in the state and undo all the
progress they have made since California signed its charter school law in
1992.